![]() ![]() Not to mention, and no offense Seb, but it's absolutely ridiculous to compare the rating of an RPG to the rating of a TPS. This usually means we only get GOOD games, thus it inflates our average. The ONLY reason our average is so high is because of the fact we only usually get in the anticipated titles. Top Spin 3: 77 (we gave it an 80 as did A TON of other sites, including IGN, GameSpot, Destruction, etc)įl0w: 71 (however a multitude of respectable sites gave it a 75+, including the likes of IGN, GamesRadar, etc) ![]() gave this game above an 81, 6 of which gave it 90 or better)įolklore: 75 (23 sites gave it 80 or better, IGN themselves gave this a 9/10, which makes our review not so "generous.") PixelJunk Eden: 80 (13 sites, most of which are highly respectable sites like IGN, etc. Twisted Metal: Head-on: Extra Twisted Edition – 8.0įaceBreaker: 57 (Though 3 sites including GI gave it 78+, I really enjoyed this game though, but I guess it could have been lower-however this is definitely a niche game) SOCOM: US Navy Seals Tactical Strike – 9.0 Metal Gear Solid: Portable Ops Plus – 5.5 Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix – 7.0 Ratchet and Clank Future: Tools of Destruction – 9.5 ![]() The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Game of the Year Edition – 9.0 LEGO Indiana Jones: The Original Adventures – 8.0 Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots – 10 Ratchet and Clank Future: Quest for Booty – 8.0 PSU Review Scores as of September 6, 2008 Well I had to do it for Metacritic, so I figured I should post it just to show I did a few hours of work today: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |